Economic think tank, the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) has suggested that the Centre withdraw its proposed 0.4% merchant discount rate (MDR) charge on select person-to-merchant (P2M) UPI transactions, PTI reported.
“The government should withdraw the proposed charges scheduled to take effect on October 15 and keep UPI free for merchants and consumers,” said GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava.
In a statement, the body said that the proposed UPI charges, scheduled to come into effect this month, could raise prices, squeeze small business and weaken household demand, the report added. It has asked the government to keep the digital payment system free for merchants and consumers.
This comes after the Centre ended six-years of zero-on UPI payments and last month said that a 0.4% fee would be imposed on P2M transactions over ₹2,000 in value. It capped the charge at ₹300 on transactions of and above ₹75,000 worth and kept P2P and P2PM transactions free.
Why does GTRI want UPI MDR charge rolled back?
According to the statement, besides affecting small businesses, the charges would also reduce UPI’s price advantage over cards, benefiting US card networks and platforms. The GTRI added that an independent audit should establish and publish UPI’s actual running costs.
Srivastava said that banks save on handling cash and operating ATMs and branches when customers use UPI, and payment apps gain customers’ spending data and opportunities to sell , insurance and mutual funds in a market serving more than 55 crore Indians.
The government, he said, benefits from wider digital payments and greater visibility of economic . “These benefits support the case for sharing UPI’s running costs. If these institutions fund the system, UPI can remain free and preserve its advantage over cards. Charging merchants reduces that advantage and creates commercial opportunities for competing payment networks,” he said.
He added that and Google Pay, which together handle more than 80% of UPI transactions, could earn a share of merchant fees if the fee-sharing arrangement provides for it.
“Their market dominance would give them a large potential base for such earnings,” Srivastava said, adding, “Visa and Mastercard could benefit when UPI loses part of its price advantage. Free UPI allows merchants to receive the full payment. An MDR reduces that benefit and could make cards more competitive. The card networks also seek access to UPI comparable to that enjoyed by credit cards.”
India should resist US pressure to weaken UPI, drawing on Brazil’s defence of Pix, its domestic system, he said, adding that UPI’s affordability and widespread acceptance are economic strengths that India should preserve.
Further, he said that annual UPI payment value exceeded 91% of India’s GDP last year, indicating the system’s reach, but the proposed fees could affect the economy beyond the transactions directly charged.
“Higher prices would leave households with less for other purchases. Where competition prevents price increases, farmers, vendors and businesses would absorb the cost through lower earnings,” the GTRI Founder said.
He added that weaker earnings and demand could lead firms to buy less stock, postpone investment and hire fewer workers.
(With inputs from PTI)