Barclays sees 13–14 million bpd oil supply loss from prolonged Hormuz disruption

Barclays said on Thursday that a prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz would likely lead ​to a
13-14 million barrels per day supply loss, noting ‌that while the
scale of the disruption is immense, ​so is the uncertainty around
its duration.

Exports from ⁠Yanbu and Fujairah have picked up in recent
weeks and assuming no threat to shipments from these ports, the
bank sees ‌a supply disruption of that magnitude as likely in the
event of a prolonged closure of ‌the Strait.

The International Energy Agency estimates world oil ‌demand
this ⁠year will be about 104-105 million bpd.

Barclays ⁠added that the Iran war has triggered the largest
geopolitical shock to energy markets since the 1990 Gulf War,
driven by extremely tight ​spot fundamentals rather than
speculative ‌excess.

US President Donald Trump has said Iran is desperate to
make a deal to end nearly four weeks of fighting, contradicting
the Iranian foreign minister who said his ‌country was reviewing
a US proposal but had ​no intention of holding talks to wind
down the conflict.

“Notwithstanding uncertainty about the ceasefire
negotiations, in our ⁠base case, we expect traffic through the
Strait to normalize by early April, which would be consistent
with Brent averaging $85/b ‌in 2026,” Barclays said in a note.



However, if disruptions persist until end-April, 2026 Brent
forwards could reprice to $100 per barrel, and in a more
prolonged scenario stretching to end-May prices could rise to
$110.

Iran has blocked the Strait of Hormuz, trapping roughly a
fifth of the ‌world’s oil and liquefied natural gas supplies,
boosting crude oil above $100 a ​barrel – and delivering sticker
shock at the pumps.

Oil prices climbed over 2% on Thursday, with ⁠Brent futures
trading at $104.36 a barrel by 0647 GMT, while U.S. ⁠West
Texas Intermediate crude futures were at $92.23 a barrel.

Barclays also said that supply elasticity is structurally
weaker ‌than in past shocks, with OPEC+ spare capacity
under-delivering and non-OPEC+ growth, led by the U.S., steadily
decelerating ​due to years of under-investment.

Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

four × 5 =