Bengaluru real estate: Can a homebuyer approach the Karnataka RERA for apartment rental disputes?

The Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority has directed a Bengaluru-based developer and its partner to pay 12 lakh annually to compensate a homebuyer for rental losses, following their failure to hand over physical possession of a flat despite executing the sale deed. Additionally, the authority has ordered them to pay 2 lakh as compensation for mental agony.

Karnataka RERA directed a Bengaluru developer and partner to pay  ₹12 lakh yearly to a buyer for rental losses after failing to hand over a flat despite executing the sale deed. (Photo for representational purposes only) (AI generated image using ChatGPT)
Karnataka RERA directed a Bengaluru developer and partner to pay ₹12 lakh yearly to a buyer for rental losses after failing to hand over a flat despite executing the sale deed. (Photo for representational purposes only) (AI generated image using ChatGPT)

‘This court cannot ignore the prevailing rental/commercial realities in a metropolitan city such as Bengaluru. Apart from the financial loss, the complainant has also suffered inconvenience, uncertainty and hardship due to the failure of the respondents to give the rent of the said flat to the complainant,” KRERA said in its order.

In this case, the developer, Surya Homes, and its partner, Bagpack Suites Bangalore Pvt Ltd, told KRERA that disputes relating to rent were outside the authority’s jurisdiction.

“The respondents are hereby to pay compensation of 12 lakh per annum to the complainant towards loss of rent calculated from 06.12.2019 till handover of physical possession by deducting the amount, if any, already paid towards rent,” the order said.

“Further, the respondents are directed to pay compensation of 2 lakh towards mental agony to the complainant,” it said.

Also Read: The case



In this case, the homebuyer entered into an agreement in July 2019 to purchase an apartment in the Surya Elegance project, including a covered parking space. He initially paid 17.7 lakh and later completed the purchase in December 2019 by paying the remaining 93.2 lakh. In addition, he spent around 20 lakh on interiors, taking his total investment in the property to about 1.30 crore, the order said.

“The developer agreed to pay a rental of 1.06 lakh per month from the date of registration. So far, he has paid an amount of 7.69 lakh. Rent amount due as on 16.12.2022 is 30.81 lakh,” the order said.

The homebuyer told KRERA that the developer is liable to pay interest for the delay and also compensate for not handing over possession on time.

However, the developer told the authority that the company had completed the construction in 2018 and also obtained the occupancy certificate in November 2018.

“The developer contended that the of the respondents towards the said flat is completed once the sale deed was registered on 06.12.2019 and handover possession of the same in favour of the complainants on the same day,” it said.

“They are not at all obliged to pay any rentals to the complainants as they have not entered into any rental agreements/arrangements with the complainants. This court has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the claims for rents by the complainants,” the order said.

Also Read:

KRERA order

The authority noted that the homebuyer approached the court seeking compensation for loss of rental and mental agony.

“The grievances are that he had purchased an apartment in the project of the respondents under a sale deed dated 06.12.2019, and on the same day, the respondents have taken possession of the same, agreeing to pay rent of Rs. 1.06 lakh per month from the date of registration. Thereafter, the developer had paid an amount of 7.69 lakh to date. Hence, the rent amount due is 30.18 lakh,” it said.

The authority noted that even though the developer had executed the sale deed and received the full payment, they continued to retain the flat under the pretext of paying rent, thereby depriving the complainant of using the property or earning rental income from it for a significant period.

The authority observed that had been withheld and held the respondents accountable for the resulting financial losses and the hardship caused to the complainant.

A list of questions has been sent to the developer. The story will be updated once a response is received.

Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

twenty − 4 =