As protectionism, geopolitical tensions and supply-chain vulnerabilities reshape the global economy, Prime Minister Narendra Modi re-emphasized the push for a self-reliant India in his Independence Day address. Yet, even as talk of de-globalization gains momentum worldwide, the evidence points to transformation rather than an across-the-board retreat.
Traditional merchandise trade is facing growing headwinds from higher tariffs and other trade barriers. But cross-border integration continues through services, investment and digital flows. Supply chains are being reconfigured rather than dismantled, while new trading partners are gaining prominence.
For India, the push to strengthen domestic capabilities need not be at odds with deeper global integration.
Still connected
Despite the growing momentum of protectionism over the past two decades, it has not translated into a fundamental retreat from globalization, which extends beyond to services, investment and financial flows.
The KOF Globalization Index, which captures economic, social and political integration, shows that the world became more globalized between 2010 and 2023, though countries followed markedly different paths. Major industrial hubs such as the US and China have increasingly turned inward on merchandise trade, using industrial subsidies, import restrictions and policies aimed at strengthening domestic production. Yet, their overall globalization scores continued to rise, reflecting deeper integration through other channels.
Connector economies such as Vietnam, India and the UAE have become more globally integrated, benefiting from shifting supply chains, investment diversification and multinational firms broadening their production bases. European economies such as Spain and Germany also remained deeply integrated through regional trade and investment ties.
The emerging world order, therefore, points less to wholesale de-globalization and more to fragmentation and reconfiguration as the channels and geography of global integration shift.
Trade transition
Even as globalization shows little sign of retreating, it is changing lanes, with services gaining ground as goods trade loses momentum. The era of hyper-globalization in goods may have run its course, with merchandise trade surging from 32.4% of world GDP in 1995 to 51% in 2008, but never sustainably regaining that level since the global financial crisis.
The rise of trade wars since the first Trump presidency has added to these headwinds, as higher tariffs, non-tariff barriers and industrial policies increasingly constrain merchandise flows. Services, however, tell a different story. Services trade as a share of has continued to trend upwards, increasing from 12.4% in 2008 to a record 15.1% in 2024, compared with just 8.5% in 1995.
Unlike goods, services are not directly subject to tariffs, although regulatory and market-access barriers remain. has also made services ranging from software and consulting to finance and business processes increasingly tradable across borders, opening new channels for global economic integration.
Resilient routes
A key indicator of global integration is the foreign value-added content of exports, which measures the share of a country’s exports that comes from inputs sourced abroad.
A product exported by one economy may contain components, raw materials, technology and services sourced from several others, reflecting the deep integration of production across borders. On this measure, international production networks remain closely intertwined. The global average foreign value-added share of gross exports increased from 19.5% in 1995 to a record 26.9% in 2022, before stabilizing at around 25% in recent years.
Notably, neither the global financial crisis nor the pandemic produced a lasting reversal, highlighting the resilience of these networks. Even amid the ongoing , firms have largely responded not by abandoning international supply chains, but by diversifying suppliers, exploring alternative markets, and rerouting shipments to manage emerging risks.
Thus, as supply-chain security assumes greater importance in the changing global order, the response appears to be diversification rather than isolation.
Recasting ties
Most global goods trade either takes place among geopolitically aligned countries or involves unaligned economies, while trade across rival geopolitical blocs accounts for a much smaller share. This limits the extent to which geopolitical fragmentation necessarily translates into deglobalization.
In fact, the share of global goods trade between rival blocs has declined from 13.5% in 2010 to 10.2% in 2025. Direct trade between the US and China has also weakened, falling from a peak of 3.6% of global goods trade in 2015 to 2% in 2025.
At the same time, the share of trade involving unaligned economies, including connector countries such as India, Vietnam, Mexico and Brazil, has increased from about 42% to 47%.
These economies are playing an increasingly important role in global commerce as companies diversify production and sourcing across a wider set of markets. Rather than simply severing trade links, firms are reorganizing supply chains through third countries, involving both the rerouting of trade and the relocation of production.
Capital pivot
Another dimension of globalization’s changing contours is the shifting destination of international capital. According to UNCTAD’s World Investment Report 2026, cross-border investment is increasingly moving away from traditional manufacturing towards sectors considered critical to future economic and technological competitiveness.
Five strategic sectors, namely and related technologies, advanced technologies, critical minerals, energy-transition technologies and services, and semiconductors, accounted for 44% of global greenfield investment in 2025, up sharply from 16% in 2020. AI infrastructure emerged as the largest segment, while semiconductors have been the fastest-growing.
In contrast, announced greenfield investment in manufacturing outside strategic sectors during 2021-25 was 17% lower than in 2015-19, with labour-intensive activities particularly under pressure. Global capital is therefore being redirected towards strategic technologies and the countries at the forefront of them, reshaping the next phase of globalization.
Puneet Kumar Arora is an assistant professor of economics at Delhi Technological University. Jaydeep Mukherjee is a professor of economics at Great Lakes Institute of Management, Chennai.