New vs old regime: Earning ₹20 LPA? Here’s which regime saves you over ₹1 lakh

The higher tax relief announced in Budget 2025 has made the the preferred option for many salaried taxpayers. While lower tax rates and a higher standard deduction have improved its appeal, the choice is not always straightforward for those earning 20 lakh a year.

At this income level, taxpayers are no longer eligible for the rebate under Section 87A, making the comparison between the two regimes more nuanced. Instead of relying on a rebate, the decision hinges on whether the lower tax rates under the new regime can outweigh the exemptions and deductions available under the old regime.

These include benefits such as House Rent Allowance (HRA), Leave Travel Allowance (LTA), deductions under Sections 80C and 80D, and additional contributions to the National Pension System (NPS). A comparison of the two regimes shows how these tax breaks stack up against the lower slab rates under the new regime for a salaried individual earning 20 lakh annually.

New regime: Lower tax rates reduce the tax burden

Under the new regime, salaried taxpayers are entitled to a standard deduction of 75,000. For an individual earning 20 lakh a year, this brings the taxable income down to 19.25 lakh.

Also Read |

Since taxpayers in this income bracket do not qualify for the rebate under Section 87A, the tax savings under the new regime come solely from its concessional slab rates. According to calculations by ClearTax, the total tax liability, including the 4% health and education cess, works out to 1,92,400.

Particulars

Amount ( )

Gross salary 20,00,000
Less: Standard deduction 75,000
Taxable income 19,25,000
Tax payable (including 4% cess) 1,92,400

Source: ClearTax tax computation for FY 2025-26.



For taxpayers who do not have substantial deductions to claim, the new regime’s lower tax rates can significantly reduce the overall tax outgo despite the absence of most exemptions.

Can deductions make the old regime more rewarding?

The old regime continues to allow a range of exemptions and deductions that are unavailable under the new regime. These include HRA, LTA, children’s education allowance, deductions under , health insurance premiums under Section 80D and additional NPS contributions under Section 80CCD(1B).

To understand whether these benefits can offset the lower tax rates offered by the new regime, let us see an example explained by ClearTax. It assumes a salaried employee earning 20 lakh annually who claims the following tax breaks:

HRA exemption: 1 lakh

LTA exemption: 20,000

Children’s education allowance: 9,600

Professional tax deduction: 2,400

Section 80C deduction: 1.5 lakh

Additional NPS deduction under Section 80CCD(1B): 50,000

Section 80D deduction: 25,000

After accounting for these exemptions and deductions, the taxpayer’s income under the head ‘Salary’ falls to 18.18 lakh, while the net taxable income is reduced to 15.93 lakh.

How much tax is payable under the old regime?

Despite claiming several of the most commonly used deductions and exemptions, the tax liability under the old regime remains higher than under the new regime.

Particulars

Amount ( )

Gross salary 20,00,000
Less: HRA exemption 1,00,000
Less: LTA exemption 20,000
Less: Children’s education allowance 9,600
Less: Standard deduction 50,000
Less: Professional tax 2,400
Income under the head ‘Salary’ 18,18,000
Less: Section 80C deduction 1,50,000
Less: Section 80CCD(1B) deduction 50,000
Less: Section 80D deduction 25,000
Net taxable income 15,93,000
Tax payable (including 4% cess) 3,02,016

Source: ClearTax tax computation for FY 2025-26.

The calculation shows that even after claiming popular tax-saving deductions worth over 2 lakh, along with exemptions such as HRA and LTA, the taxpayer would still pay more than 3 lakh in income tax under the old regime.

Also Read |

Which regime works better?

For a salaried individual earning 20 lakh annually, the new tax regime emerges as the more tax-efficient option. According to ClearTax’s calculations, the tax liability under the new regime is 1,92,400, compared with 3,02,016 under the old regime. This translates into a tax saving of 1,09,616 by opting for the new regime, even after foregoing deductions such as HRA, LTA, children’s education allowance, Section 80C investments, NPS contributions and premiums.

However, this does not mean the old regime is no longer relevant. The benefit of the old regime increases as the value of deductions and exemptions rises. According to ClearTax’s analysis, a taxpayer would need total deductions and exemptions of more than 7,08,330 for the old regime to become more beneficial than the new one. Such a scenario may apply to individuals claiming substantial HRA exemptions, home loan interest deductions, higher NPS contributions and other eligible tax benefits.

For most salaried taxpayers with moderate deductions, however, the lower slab rates under the new regime continue to provide a larger tax advantage, making it the more rewarding option at the 20 lakh income level.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

three × 2 =